Transfer track format information for tracks at a first processor node to a second processor node

ABSTRACT

Provided are a computer program product, system, and method for managing failover from a first processor node including a first cache to a second processor node including a second cache. Storage areas assigned to the first processor node are reassigned to the second processor node. For each track indicated in a cache list of tracks in the first cache for the reassigned storage areas, the first processor node adds a track identifier of the track and track format information indicating a layout and format of data in the track to a cache transfer list. The first processor node transfers the cache transfer list to the second processor node. The second processor node uses the track format information transferred with the cache transfer list to process read and write requests to tracks in the reassigned storage areas staged into the second cache.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a computer program product, system, and method to transfer track format information for tracks in cache at a first processor node to a second process node to which the first processor node is failing over.

2. Description of the Related Art

In a storage environment, a host system may communicate a read/write request to a connected storage system over network channel through a network adaptor. If the data is in a cache of the storage system, i.e., a read hit, then the data may be returned quickly to the host system. This reduces the delay in returning requested data to a host I/O request. However, if the requested data is not in the cache of the storage system, then there may be significant latency realized while the storage system needs to retrieve the requested data from storage to return. Further, the thread or task executing the host read request may have to be context switched and deactivated in order to allow the host system to process further I/O requests. When the data is returned to the read request, then the task must be reactivated and data for the task must be returned to registers and processor cache to allow processing of the returned data for the read request.

In a storage system having two processor nodes, ownership of storage areas or volumes may initially be divided between both processor nodes so each of the processor nodes bears a burden of the I/O requests. In certain situations, one of the processor nodes needs to be taken offline. In such case, a failover may occur from the processor node being taken offline to the surviving processor node to handle I/O requests for those storage areas initially owned by the processor node at which failover is occurring. The failover operation may involve destaging all modified tracks from the processor node failing over and then reassigning ownership of the volumes or storage areas from the failing processor node to the surviving processor node. After the failed processor node becomes available, a failback may occur to reassign the ownership of those storage areas or volumes moved to the surviving processor node back to the other processor node from which the volumes were reassigned to return to the state where both processor nodes are operating and share the storage areas to which I/O requests are directed.

There is a need in the art for improved techniques for processing host read/write requests to the cache in a surviving processor node after a failover.

SUMMARY

Provided are a computer program product, system, and method for managing failover from a first processor node including a first cache to a second processor node including a second cache. Storage areas assigned to the first processor node are reassigned to the second processor node. For each track indicated in a cache list of tracks in the first cache for the reassigned storage areas, the first processor node adds a track identifier of the track and track format information indicating a layout and format of data in the track to a cache transfer list. The first processor node transfers the cache transfer list to the second processor node. The second processor node uses the track format information transferred with the cache transfer list to process read and write requests to tracks in the reassigned storage areas staged into the second cache.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a storage environment.

FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of a track format table entry.

FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a cache control block.

FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of a cache Least Recently Used (LRU) list of tracks in the cache.

FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of a demoted cache Least Recently Used (LRU) list of tracks demoted from the cache.

FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a demoted cache control block.

FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of a demoted cache control block directory entry.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of operations to process a read/write request received on a first channel, such as a bus interface.

FIG. 9 illustrates receive an embodiment of operations to process a read/write request received on a second channel, such as a network.

FIGS. 10a, 10b, and 10c illustrate an embodiment of operations to stage a track into the cache.

FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of operations to close track metadata and determine a track format code for the track in cache of the closed track metadata.

FIG. 12 illustrates an embodiment of a storage environment in which the storage system has dual processor nodes.

FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment of an entry in a cache transfer list.

FIG. 14 illustrates an embodiment of operations to initiate a failover at the processor node from which failover is occurring.

FIG. 15 illustrates an embodiment of operations at the processor node to which failover is occurring to perform the failover at the node that will be taking over operations for the other processor node.

FIG. 16 illustrates an embodiment of operations at the processor node that is operational to failback to the processor node from which the failover occurred.

FIG. 17 illustrates an embodiment of a computer architecture used with described embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In a storage environment, a host system may first communicate a read/write request to a connected storage system over a fast channel, such as a bus interface, such as the Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) interface. For a read/write request over the fast channel which is supposed to complete within a threshold time, the host system holds the application thread for the read/write request in a spin loop waiting for the request to complete. This saves processor time associated with a context swap, which deactivates the thread and reactivates the thread in response to an interrupt when a response to the read/write request is received. If the data for the read/write request sent on the fast channel is not in cache, then the storage system may fail the read/write request and the host system may communicate the same read/write request over a storage area network via a host adaptor, which is slower than processing the I/O request over the bus, e.g., PCIe interface. Communicating the read/write request over the second channel requires the host system to perform context switch from the task handling the read/write request to another task while waiting for the read/write request to complete. Context switching is costly because it requires the processor running the task to clear all registers and L1 and L2 caches for the new task, and then when completing the new task, reactivate the context switched task and return the state data to the registers and L1 and L2 caches for the task that was context switched while waiting for the read/write request to complete.

Certain read/write operations need to be completed within a threshold time, else they are failed. The storage system will have to access track metadata to process a request to a track. The track metadata provides information on the format of data and layout of records in the track that are needed in order to perform reads and writes to the track. However, the reading of the track metadata from the storage comprises a substantial portion of the latency in processing read/write request. Described embodiments provide improvements to cache technology that reduce cache operation latency by including a track format code in the cache control block for a track in the cache. This track format code may be used for fast access to the track format from a track format table without having to read the track metadata from storage. By eliminating the need to read the track metadata from a metadata track in storage to determine the track layout, described embodiments increase the likelihood that read/write requests on the first channel that need to be completed within a threshold time are completed by accessing the track layout information for a track from the track format table, associating track format codes with track format information for common track formats.

Described embodiments provide further improvements to cache computer technology by reducing cache latency for a track staged into cache that was previously demoted by saving track format metadata, such as the track format code, when a track is demoted from the cache. When the demoted track is later staged into cache, the track format metadata may be quickly determined by the track format information saved with the demoted track and included in a cache control block for the staged track without having to read the metadata for the staged track. Avoiding the need to read the track metadata for a staged track substantially reduces the latency and delays in staging a track and processing a read/write request to the staged track.

With described embodiments, a read/write request to a target track on a channel requiring that the request be completed within a threshold time is processed if the track format code for the target track is within the cache control block for the target track. Using the track format code to access the track format metadata from the track format table reduces the latency of access to the track format metadata to allow the read/write request to complete within the time threshold. This keeps the time the host thread is spinning on the read/write request task for the read/write request sent on the bus interface within an acceptable time threshold. However, if the cache control block for the target track does not have a valid track format code, then the read/write request on the first channel is failed because it is unlikely the read/write request can complete within the threshold time given that the track format metadata will have to be retrieved from the storage. Failing the read/write request on the first channel, causes the host to redrive the read/write request on the second channel. The processing of the read/write request on the second channel reads in the track metadata from the storage to allow for processing the read/write request and adding the track format code to the cache control block for the target track.

In a storage system having two processor nodes, after a failover, the surviving processor node takes over the storage areas managed by the failed processor node. In the prior art when this occurred, after failover, data for tracks subject to I/O requests redirected to the surviving processor node would not be in cache, and the surviving processor node would have to read the track metadata for requested tracks to storage areas, whose ownership was transferred to the surviving processor node, in order to determine the track format and layout to use to service the I/O request. Described embodiments reduce the latency of I/O requests redirected to a surviving processor node after failover by having the failing processor node transfer track format information of tracks in the cache at the failing processor node as part of the failover process. The surviving processor node may maintain this transferred track format information for tracks in the failing processor node cache, such as track format codes, to use for subsequent I/O requests to the tracks in storage areas for which ownership was transferred to the surviving processor node. In this way, when subsequent requests are received after failover to these storage areas reassigned to the surviving processor node, the surviving processor node may use the track format information transferred over from the failing processor node to determine the track format and layout without having to read track metadata from the storage. This substantially reduces latency in processing I/O requests after failover to the reassigned storage areas by avoiding the need to read the track metadata. Further, because the track format information is transferred for those tracks that were in the cache of the processor node taken offline, there is a greater likelihood that there will continue to be requests toward those same tracks in the cache after the failover. This means that the latency reduction benefits of transferring the track format information will likely be realized at the surviving processor node for multiple I/O requests after failover.

FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a storage environment in which a host 100 directs read and write requests to a storage system 102 to access tracks in volumes configured in storage devices 104 in a disk enclosure 106. The host 100 includes a processor complex 108 of one or more processor devices and a memory 110 including an operating system 111 executed by the processor complex 108. The host operating system 111 generates read and write requests to tracks configured in the storage devices 104. The host 100 includes hardware to communicate read and write requests on two different channels. A first channel is a bus interface, such as a Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe), including a bus 112, a bus switch 114 to connect one or more devices on the bus 112, including the processor complex 108, a memory system 110, and a bus host adaptor 116 to extend the bus interface over an external bus interface cable 118 to the storage system 102. Additional bus interface technology to extend the bus interface may be utilized, including PCIe extender cables or components, such as a distributed PCIe switch, to allow PCIe over Ethernet, such as with the ExpEther technology. A second channel to connect the host 100 and storage system 102 uses a network host adaptor 120, connected to the bus 112, that connects to a separate network 122 over which the host 100 and storage system 102 additionally communicate. The first channel through the bus interface may comprise a faster access channel than the network 122 interface through the network host adaptor 120.

The storage system 102 includes a bus interface comprising a bus 124 a, 124 b, a bus switch 126 to connect to endpoint devices on the bus 124 a, 124 b, and a bus host adaptor 128 to connect to the external bus interface cable 118 to allow communication over the bus interface to the host 100 over the first channel. The storage system 102 includes an Input/Output bay 130 having the bus host adaptor 128, one or more device adaptors 132 to connect to the storage devices 104, and one or more network host adaptors 134 to connect to the network 122 and host systems.

The storage system 102 includes a processor complex 136 of one or more processor devices and a memory 138 having a cache 140 to cache tracks accessed by the connected hosts 100. The memory 138 includes a cache manager 142 and a storage manager 144. The storage manager 144 manages access requests from processes in the hosts 100 and storage system 102 for tracks in the storage 104. The devices 136, 138, 128, 132, and 134 connect over the bus interface implemented in the bus lanes 124 a, 124 b and bus switch 126.

The cache manager 142 maintains accessed tracks in the cache 140 for future read access to the tracks to allow the accessed tracks to be returned from the faster access cache 140 instead of having to retrieve from the storage 104. Further, tracks in the cache 140 may be updated by writes. A track may comprise any unit of data configured in the storage 104, such as a track, Logical Block Address (LBA), etc., which is part of a larger grouping of tracks, such as a volume, logical device, etc.

The cache manager 142 maintains cache management information 146 in the memory 138 to manage read (unmodified) and write (modified) tracks in the cache 140. The cache management information 146 may include a track format table 200 having track format codes for common track format descriptors providing details of a layout and format of data in a track; track index 148 providing an index of tracks in the cache 140 to cache control blocks in a control block directory 300; and a Least Recently Used (LRU) list 400 for tracks in the cache 140. The control block directory 300 includes the cache control blocks, where there is one cache control block for each track in the cache 140 providing metadata on the track in the cache 140. The track index 148 associates tracks with the cache control blocks providing information on the tracks in the cache 140. Upon determining that the cache LRU list 400 is full or has reached a threshold level, tracks are demoted from the LRU list 400 to make room for more tracks to stage into the cache 140 from the storage 104.

In certain embodiments, there may be multiple hosts 100 that connect to the storage system 102 over the first and second channels to access tracks in the storage devices 104. In such case, the storage system 102 would have at least one bus host adaptor 128 to connect to the bus interface 118 of each connected host 100 and one or more network host adaptors 134 to connect to the network host adaptors 120 on the hosts 100.

In one embodiment, the bus interfaces 112, 114, 116, 118, 124 a, 124 b, 126, and 128 may comprise a Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) bus interface technology. In alternative embodiments, the bus interfaces 112, 114, 116, 118, 124 a, 124 b, 126, and 128 may utilize suitable bus interface technology other than PCIe. The bus host adaptors 116 and 128 may comprise PCIe host adaptors that provide the interface to connect to the PCIe cable 118. The network 122 may comprise a Storage Area Network (SAN), a Local Area Network (LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), the Internet, an Intranet, etc., and the network host adaptors 120, 134 provide the network 122 connections between the hosts 100 and storage system 102.

The storage system 102 may comprise a storage system, such as the International Business Machines Corporation (IBM®) DS8000® and DS8880 storage systems, or storage controllers and storage systems from other vendors. (IBM and DS8000 are trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation throughout the world). The host operating system 111 may comprise an operating system such as Z Systems Operating System (Z/OS®) from International Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”) or other operating systems known in the art. (Z/OS is a registered trademark of IBM throughout the world).

The storage devices 104 in the disk enclosure 106 may comprise different types or classes of storage devices, such as magnetic hard disk drives, solid state storage device (SSD) comprised of solid state electronics, EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory), flash memory, flash disk, Random Access Memory (RAM) drive, storage-class memory (SCM), etc., Phase Change Memory (PCM), resistive random access memory (RRAM), spin transfer torque memory (STT-RAM), conductive bridging RAM (CBRAM), magnetic hard disk drive, optical disk, tape, etc. Volumes in a storage space may further be configured from an array of devices, such as Just a Bunch of Disks (JBOD), Direct Access Storage Device (DASD), Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) array, virtualization device, etc. Further, the storage devices 104 in the disk enclosure 106 may comprise heterogeneous storage devices from different vendors and different types of storage devices, such as a first type of storage devices, e.g., hard disk drives, that have a slower data transfer rate than a second type of storage devices, e.g., SSDs.

FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of a track format table entry 200 _(i) in the track format table 200, which includes a track format code 202 and the track format metadata 204. In certain embodiments Count Key Data (CKD) track embodiments, the track format metadata 204 may comprise a track format descriptor (TFD) indicating a number of records in the track, a block size, a number of blocks in the track, a data length of each of the records, and a control interval size indicating an amount of data that is read or written atomically as a unit, number of blocks in a control interval, and whether a control interval spans two tracks, and other information. The track format code 202 may comprise an index value of the index entry 200 _(i) in the track format table 200. For instance, if there are 32 track format table entries 200 _(i), then the track format code 202 may comprise 5 bits to reference the different possible number of 32 entries 200 _(i).

FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of a cache control block 300 _(i) for one of the tracks in the cache 140, including, but not limited to, a cache control block identifier 302, such as an index value of the cache control block 300 _(i); a track ID 304 of the track in the storage 104; the cache LRU list 306 in which the cache control block 300 _(i) is indicated; an LRU list entry 308 at which the track is indicated; a cache timestamp 310 indicating a time the track was added to the cache 140 and indicated on the LRU list 306; additional track metadata 312 typically maintained for tracks stored in the cache 140, such as a dirty flag indicating whether the track was modified; a track format code 314 comprising one of the track format codes 202 of the track format metadata 204 describing the layout of data in the track 304 represented by the cache control block 300 _(i); a track format code valid flag 316 indicating whether the track format code 314 is valid or invalid; and an invalid reason 318 indicating a reason for the track format code valid flag 316 code being invalid, as indicated in the track format code valid flag 316.

FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of an LRU list 400 _(i), such as having a most recently used (MRU) end 402 identifying a track most recently added to the cache 140 or most recently accessed in the cache 140 and a least recently used (LRU) end 404 from which the track identified at the LRU end 404 is selected to demote from the cache 140. The MRU end 402 and LRU end 404 point to track identifiers, such as a track identifier address or a cache control block index for the track, of the tracks that have been most recently added and in the cache 140 the longest, respectively, for tracks indicated in that list 400.

FIG. 5 illustrates an embodiment of the demoted cache LRU list 500, having a most recently used (MRU) end 502 identifying a demoted track most recently added to the demoted cache LRU list 500 and a least recently used (LRU) end 504 from which the demoted track identified at the LRU end 504 is selected to demote from the demoted cache LRU list 500.

FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a demoted cache control block 600 _(i) having a track identifier (ID) 602 of a demoted track; a track format code 604 if available of the track format metadata 204 in the track format table 200 of the demoted track; a pointer to a previous LRU entry 606 of a previous demoted track in the demoted cache LRU list 500; a pointer to a next LRU entry 608 of a next demoted track in the demoted cache LRU list 500; and a pointer 610 to next demoted cache control block in the entry in the demoted cache control block directory 700 for the track ID 602.

In additional embodiments, the track format code 604 may comprise track format information other than a code 604 in a track format table 200, such as other information that may be used to identify or represent the track format metadata and layout of data in the tracks and comprises substantially less bits of information than the represented track format metadata and layout information.

FIG. 7 illustrates an embodiment of an entry 700 _(i) in the demoted cache control block directory 700 that includes pointers 702 ₁, 702 ₂ . . . 702 _(n) to demoted cache control blocks 600 _(i). Each demoted cache control block 600 _(i) maps to one entry in the demoted cache control block directory 700 based on the track ID 602. In one embodiment, a hash function of the track identifier would produce the entry in the demoted cache control block directory 700 in which the demoted cache control block 600 _(i) is indicated.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by the cache manager 142 and storage manager 144 to process a read/write request to a target track received on a first fast channel, such as the PCIe bus interface via bus host adaptor 128. Upon receiving (at block 800) the read/write request at the bus host adaptor 128, if (at block 802) the target track is not in the cache 140, then the storage manager 144 returns (at block 804) fail to the read/write request on the first channel or bus host adaptor 128 to the host 100, which causes the host 100 to retry the read/write request on the second channel or network host adaptor 120, 134. Failure is returned because if the target track is not in the cache 140, then the target track and track metadata needs to be staged into cache 140, which would likely exceed the time threshold for read/writes on the first channel, where the host processor is spinning on the thread of the read/write request. If (at block 802) the target track is in the cache 140 is a write and if (at block 808) the write modifies the track format, then the cache manager 142 sets (at block 810) the track format code valid flag 316 to invalid and indicates (at block 812) the invalid reason 318 that the track in the cache 140 was invalidated as track format change. The storage manager 144 then returns (at block 804) fail to the host 100 because the track metadata needs to be read from the storage 104 to update with the modified track format.

If (at block 806) the read/write request is a read or if (at block 808) the request is a write that does not modify the track format, then the cache manager 142 determines (at block 814) if the track format code valid flag 316 is set to valid. If so, then the cache manager 142 determines (at block 816) the track format metadata 204 in the track format table 200 corresponding to the track format code 314 in the cache control block 300 _(i). The cache manager 142 uses (at block 818) the track format layout indicated in the determined track format metadata 204 to process the read or write request to the target track in the cache 140. If the request is a write, a dirty flag 312 in the cache control block 300 _(i) may be set to indicate the track is modified. If (at block 814) the track format code valid flag 316 is invalid, meaning there is no fast access to track format information available through the track format code 314, then the storage manager 144 returns (at block 804) fail on the bus interface to the bus host adaptor 128 because the track format table 200 cannot be used, and the track metadata needs to be read from the storage 104, which would introduce too much latency for the fast read/write on the first channel.

With the embodiment of operations of FIG. 8, during a fast write over the bus interface or first channel, if the track format metadata may be accessed without latency through the track format table 200, then the read/write request is allowed to proceed when the transaction can be processed very quickly because the track metadata can be obtained directly from the track format table 200 through the track format code 314, without having to read the track metadata from storage 104. However, if the cache control block 300 _(i) does not have a valid track format code 314 to allow low latency access of track format metadata, then the read/write request is failed because the transaction will not likely complete within a fast time threshold. This determination is important to avoid host delays in processing other tasks while the host processor is spinning on the thread handling the read/write request while waiting for the read/write request to complete. If the track metadata can be accessed from the track format table 200 than there is a high likelihood the read/write can complete on the bus interface channel within the time required to avoid the host processor holding the thread for too long, which causes other I/O requests to be queued and delayed. If the track metadata cannot be accessed from the track format table 200 and needs to be read from the storage 104, then it is unlikely the read/write request will complete within the time threshold for the host processor to spin on the thread for the read/write request, and failure is returned. Returning failure when the track metadata cannot be obtained from the track format table 200 causes the host thread waiting on the read/write request task to be deactivated and the host processor may context switch to processing other tasks, and then the read/write request is retried on the second network channel during the context switch.

FIG. 9 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by the cache manager 142 and storage manager 144 to process a read/write request to a target track received on a second channel, such as the network 122 on network host adaptor 134. Upon receiving (at block 900) the read/write request, if (at block 902) the target track is not in the cache 140, then the cache manager 142 proceeds (at block 904) to block 1000 in FIG. 10a to stage the track into the cache 140. If (at block 908) the read/write request is a write and if (at block 910) the write modifies the track format, then the cache manager 142 updates (at block 912) the track metadata to indicate the modified track format and sets (at block 914) the track format code valid flag 316 to invalid. The track metadata 312 is further updated (at block 916) to indicate the track is modified or dirty. If (at block 908) the request is a read or from block 916, the cache manager 142 uses (at block 918) the track format layout indicated in the track format metadata to process the read or write request to the target track in the cache 140.

If (at block 902) the target track is in the cache 140 and if (at block 930) the track format code valid flag 316 is set to valid, then the cache manager 142 determines (at block 932) the track format metadata 204 in the track format table 200 corresponding to the track format code 314 in the cache control block 300 _(i) for the target track. From block 932, control proceeds to block 908 to process the read/write request. If (at block 930) the track format code valid flag 316 is set to invalid, then the cache manager 142 reads (at block 934) the track metadata for the target track from the storage 104 to determine the track format, e.g., size of blocks, control interval, layout of records on the track, etc. From block 934, control proceeds to block 908 to process the read/write request.

With the embodiment of FIG. 9, when the read/write request is received on the second slower channel, such as over the network 122, where the host operating system 111 would have performed a context switch for the thread handling the read/write request, the cache manager 142 may read the track metadata from the storage 104 to determine the track layout to process the request. During this time, the host processing of further host requests is not delayed because the host thread handling the read/write request is context switched and not active, until the read/write request returns complete.

FIGS. 10a, 10b, and 10c illustrate an embodiment of operations performed by the cache manager 142 to stage a track into the cache 140, which may be invoked at block 904 in FIG. 9 when the target track of a read/write request is not in the cache 140. Upon initiating (at block 1000) the operation to stage a track into the cache 140, if (at block 1002) the cache LRU list 400 is full, then the track at the LRU end 404 of the cache LRU list 400 is selected (at block 1004) to demote. If (at block 1006) the demoted cache LRU list 500 is full, then the cache manager 142 selects (at block 1008) a demoted track indicated at the LRU end 504 of the demoted cache LRU list 500 to demote. The selected demoted track is removed (at block 1010) from the LRU end 504. The cache manager 142 adjusts (at block 1012) a demoted cache control block 600 _(j) whose pointer to next LRU entry 608 points to the selected demoted track in the demoted cache LRU list 500 to indicate that the pointer 608 is null, because now that entry is at the LRU end 504 when the selected demoted track is removed from the demoted cache LRU list 500.

The cache manager 142 determines (at block 1014) an entry 700 _(i) in the demoted cache control block directory 700 having the demoted cache control block 600 _(S) of the selected demoted track. In one embodiment, the entry 700 _(i) may be determined by applying a hash function to the selected demoted track identifier. The hash function may map any of the track identifiers in the storage 104 to one of the entries 700 _(i) in the demoted cache control block directory 700. The cache manager 142 then needs to adjust the pointer 610 that points to the demoted cache control block 600 _(S) of the selected demoted track. For this, the cache manager 142 adjusts (at block 1016) a demoted cache control block 600 _(j) in the determined entry 700 _(i) that points to the demoted cache control block 600 _(S) of the selected demoted track to point to the demoted cache control block 600 _(k) pointed to by the pointer 610 of the demoted cache control block 600 _(S) of the selected demoted track. The demoted cache control block 600 _(S) for the selected demoted track is deleted (at block 1018) and indication of the deleted demoted cache control block 600 _(S) is removed (at block 1020) from the entry 700 _(i) in the demoted cache control block directory 700.

From block 1020 or if (at block 1006) the demoted cache LRU list 500 is not full, control proceeds (at block 1022) to block 1030 in FIG. 10b to add the demoted track from the cache 140 to the demoted cache LRU list 500. Upon initiating (at block 1030) the operation to add the demoted track to the demoted cache LRU list 500, the cache manager 142 indicates (at block 1032) the demoted track at the MRU end 502 of the demoted cache LRU list 500. The cache manager 142 determines (at block 1034) the cache control block 300 _(DT) for the demoted track from the cache 140 and the track format code 314 for the demoted track if one is included. The cache manager 142 generates (at block 1036) a demoted track cache control block 600 _(DT) for the track being demoted indicating a track identifier 602 of the demoted track and the determined track format code 314 for the demoted track to save the track format code in field 604 of the demoted track cache control block 600 _(DT). If there was no valid track format code 314 in the cache control block 300 _(DT), then a null value may be indicated in the field 604 indicating there is no valid track format code for the demoted track.

The cache manager 142 determines (at block 1038) the entry 700 _(i) in the demoted cache control block directory 700 that will be used to indicate the demoted cache control block 600 _(DT) of the demoted track. The next pointer 610 of the last demoted cache control block 600 _(i) indicated in the determined entry 700 _(i) is adjusted (at block 1040) to point to the demoted cache control block 600 _(DT) for the track being demoted. The demoted track control block 600 _(DT) for the demoted track is indicated (at block 1042) in the determined entry 700 _(i) in the demoted cache control block directory 700, e.g., at the end of the entry 700 _(i). After adding the demoted track to the demoted LRU list 500 and the demoted cache control block 600 _(DT) to the demoted cache control block directory 700, control proceeds (at block 1044) to block 1060 in FIG. 10c to stage the target track to the cache 140. Control also proceeds to block 1060 in FIG. 10c to stage the track if (at block 1002 in FIG. 10a ) the cache LRU list 400 is not full, so that a track does not need to be demoted from the cache 140 and added to the demoted cache LRU list 500.

Upon initiating (at block 1060) the operation to stage the track to the cache 140, the cache manager 142 stages (at block 1062) the target track into the cache 140 from the storage 104. The staging of the actual track data from the storage 104 may have been initiated earlier before or during the operations of FIGS. 10a, 10b to manage the demoted cache LRU list 500 and demoted cache control block directory 700. The target track staged into the cache 140 is indicated (at block 1064) at the MRU end 402 of the cache LRU list 400. A cache control block 300 _(ST) is generated (at block 1066) for the staged track. Control then proceeds to block 1068 read to determine if there is a demoted cache control block 600 _(ST) for the staged track that has a track format code 604 (or other track format information) that can be included in the cache control block 300 _(ST) created for the staged track. A determination is made (at block 1068) of the entry 700 _(i) in the demoted cache control block directory 700 that could have a demoted cache control block 600 _(ST) for the staged track, which entry 700 _(i) may be determined by applying a hash function to the track identifier of the staged track. The first demoted cache control block 600 _(SEL) in the determined entry 700 _(i) is selected (at block 1070). If (at block 1072) the track identifier 602 of the selected demoted cache control block 600 _(SEL) matches the track identifier of the staged track, then the track format code 604 in the selected demoted cache control block 600 _(SEL) is included (at block 1074) in the cache control block 300 _(ST) for the staged track. The cache manager 142 may then perform (at block 1076) the operations at blocks 1010, 1016, 1018, and 1020 in FIG. 10a to remove demoted track information for the staged track, including removing the demoted cache control block 600 _(ST) for the staged track, removing the staged track from the demoted cache LRU list 500, removing the indication of the demoted cache control block 600 _(ST) from the demoted cache control block directory 700, and adjusting pointers 606, 608, 610 in other demoted cache control blocks 600 _(i) that pointed to the demoted track or demoted cache control block 600 _(ST) for the staged track because the staged track is no longer demoted but active in cache 140.

If (at block 1072) the selected demoted cache control block 600 _(SEL) is not for the staged track and if (at block 1078) there is a next demoted cache control block 600 _(i) in the entry 700 _(i), which may be indicated in the pointer 610, then that next demoted cache control block is selected (at block 1080) and control returns to block 1070 to determine whether this next demoted cache control block 600 _(i) is for the staged track. If (at block 1078) there are no further next demoted cache control blocks in the determined entry 700 _(i) to consider, then the track format code 202 from a demoted track information cannot be used and the cache manager 142 reads (at block 1082) the metadata for the track from the storage 104 to determine the track format. From block 1076 after using the track format code 604 from the demoted cache control block for the staged track or after reading (at block 1082) the metadata for the staged track, control returns (at block 1084) to block 904 in FIG. 9 with staging complete to perform the read/write operation with respect to the staged track.

With the embodiments of FIGS. 10a, 10b, and 10c , the track format code for a track demoted from cache can be saved and later used when the demoted track is staged back into cache. This allows the track metadata format to be quickly determined for the demoted track staged back into cache without having to read the metadata for the track from storage. The computer performance for cache operations, particularly staging, are substantially improved and latency reduced by determining the track metadata format and layout of a track being staged into cache without having to read the metadata for the track.

FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by the cache manager 142 when closing the track metadata for a track in the cache 140, which involves destaging the track metadata to the storage 104 if changed. Upon closing (at block 1100) the track metadata for a track in the cache 140, the cache manager 140 processes (at block 1102) the track metadata to determine a track format or a layout of data in the track. If (at block 1104) the track format table 200 does not have a track format 204 matching the determined track format from the track metadata, which may happen if the determined track format is irregular, then the track format code valid flag 316 is set (at block 1106) to invalid and the invalid reason 318 is set to indicate that the track format is not supported. In such situation, read/write requests to the track having an irregular format are only processed when received through the second channel via network host adaptor 134.

If (at block 1104) the track format table has a track format 204 matching the determined track format from the track metadata, then the cache manager 142 determines the track format code 202 for the determined track format 204 in the track format table 200 and includes the track format code 202 in the field 314 in the cache control block 300 _(i). The track format code valid flag 316 is set (at block 1116) to valid. From block 1108 or 1116, control proceeds to block 1118 to destage the track metadata from the memory 138 if modified or discard if not modified.

With the operations of FIG. 11, the track format information may be indicated in the cache control block 300, with a track format code 202 having a limited number of bits to index track format metadata 204 describing track layout in a track format table 200, where the track metadata itself would not fit into the cache control block 300 _(i). For future read/write accesses, if a valid track format code 314 is provided, then the cache manager 142 may use that code 314 to obtain with low latency the track format metadata 204 from the track format table 200 without having to read the track metadata from the storage 104 and process to determine the track format.

Dual Processor Node Environment

FIG. 12 illustrates an embodiment of the storage environment of FIG. 1 having components 1200, 1202, 1204, 1206, 1208, 1210, 1211, 1212, 1214, 1216, 1220, 1222, 1224 a, 1224 b, 1226, 1228, 1230, 1232, 1234 that comprise the components 100, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, 111, 112, 114, 116, 120, 122, 124 a, 124 b, 126, 128, 130, 132, 134 of the storage environment described with respect to FIG. 1. The embodiment of FIG. 12 additionally includes two processor nodes 1250 ₁ and 1250 ₂, where each of the processor nodes 1250 ₁ and 1250 ₂ would handle Input/Output (I/O) requests to different assigned storage areas configured in the storage 1206. For instance, storage areas comprising certain volumes, specific ranges of tracks, Logical Subsystems (LSSs), logical volumes, etc., configured in the storage 106 may be initially or default assigned to one of the processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂.

Each of the processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ would include, as shown and described with respect to FIGS. 1-7, a processor complex 136 and the components in the memory 138, including components 140, 142, 144, 146, 148, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, and 700. Further, each of the processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ would be capable of performing the operations of FIGS. 8-9, 10 a, 10 b, 10 c, and 11 to manage their respective cache 140 and I/O requests directed thereto.

Each of the processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ additionally include a cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂ that includes tracks and track format codes to transfer to the other processor node 1250 ₂, 1250 ₁ as part of a failover or failback operation; a failover manager 1254 ₁, 1254 ₂ to manage failover and failback operations between the processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂; a code load 1256 ₁, 1256 ₂ to apply to the respective processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ to update software and/or firmware of the storage manager 144, cache manager 142, and/or failover manager 1254 ₁, 1254 ₂; and assigned storage areas 1258 ₁, 1258 ₂ assigned to the processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ as part of an initial assignment, including range of tracks, volumes, LSSs, logical volume, etc. The storage areas indicated in the assignments 1258 ₁, 1258 ₂ may be modified temporarily during a failover or for regular operations to divide the storage 1206 space while both processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ are operating in dual cluster mode.

During operations while both processor nodes 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ are operating, the bus host adaptor 1228 and network host adaptor 1234 would direct a received I/O request to the processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ assigned the track to which the I/O request is directed according to the assigned storage areas 1258 ₁, 1258 ₂. The bus host adaptor 1228 and network host adaptor 1234 may maintain information on the assigned storage areas 1258 ₁, 1258 ₂ to direct I/O requests to the assigned processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂. Any changes to the storage areas assigned would be propagated to the bus host adaptor 1228 and network host adaptor 1234 to implement.

FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment of an entry 1300 _(i,j) in the cache transfer lists 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂, where entry j includes a track identifier (ID) 1302 and a track format code 1304 comprising one of the track format codes 202 in the track format table 202 indicating track format metadata 204 for the track 1302.

FIG. 14 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed by the failover manager 1254 ₁, 1254 ₂ (or other components such as the cache manager 142 and/or storage manager 144) in the processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ that is failing over to the other processor node 1250 ₂, 1250 ₁. FIGS. 14, 15, and 16 are described with respect to a failover from a first processor node 1250 ₁ to the second processor node 1250 ₂, and then a failback from the second processor node 1250 ₂ to the first processor node 1250 ₁. However, the operations may also apply with respect to a failover from the second processor node 1250 ₂ to the first processor node 1250 ₁, and then a failback from the first processor node 1250 ₁ to the second processor node 1250 ₂. Upon initiating (at block 1400) a failover from the first processor node 1250, to the second processor node 1250 ₂, the failover managers 12541 and 1254 ₂ quiesce (at block 1402) reads and writes to the assigned storage areas 1258 ₁ and 1258 ₂ to the first 1250 ₁ and second 1250 ₂ processor nodes, respectively. The bus 1228 and network 1234 host adaptors may quiesce the I/O requests in the adaptors 1228 and 1234. The modified data in both caches 140 ₁ and 140 ₂ at both processor nodes 1250 ₁ and 1250 ₂, respectively, is destaged (at block 1404) and ownership of first storage areas indicated in the assigned storage areas 1258 ₁ is transferred to the second processor node 1250 ₂, so that the adaptors 1228 and 1234 will direct I/O requests to the first storage areas to the second processor node 1250 ₂.

The failover manager 1254 ₁ proceeds to block 1408 to build the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁. At block 1408, the failover manager 1254 ₁ selects (at block 1408) a track at the MRU end 402 of the cache LRU list 400 of the first processor node 1250 ₁. and accesses (at block 1410) the cache control block 300, for the selected track in the cache control block directory 300 of the first processor node 1250 ₁. If (at block 1412) the accessed cache control block 300 _(i) has a valid track format code 314, then an entry 1300 _(1,j) is added to the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁ having the track identifier of the selected track and the track format code 314 in the accessed cache control block 300 _(i) in fields 1302 and 1304, respectively. If (from the no branch of block 1412) there is no valid track format code 314 in the cache control block 300 _(i), such as if track format code valid flag 316 indicates invalid, or after adding (at block 1414) the entry 1300 _(1,j) to the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁, then a determination is made (at block 1416) if there are further tracks in the cache LRU list 400 to consider. If so, then a next track in the cache LRU list 400 is selected (at block 1418) and control proceeds back to block 1410 to determine whether to include an entry 1300 _(1,j) in the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁. If (at block 1416) there are no further entries in the cache LRU list 400 of first processor node 1250 ₁, then the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁ is transmitted (at block 1420) to the second processor node 1250 ₂.

The operations of FIG. 14 allow the processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ that will failover to generate a cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂ having information on the track format codes or track format information for tracks in the cache 140 that may be provided to the surviving processor node 1250 ₂, 1250 ₁ to use for tracks in storage areas being reassigned to the surviving processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂. This allows the surviving processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ to avoid having to read the track metadata to process I/O requests to the tracks and instead use the track format metadata from the information provided in the cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂. This improves I/O processing performance in the surviving processor node after a failover by not having to read the track metadata in the storage to determine the track format and layout. Further, since the track format information in the cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂ is for tracks that were already in the cache 140 before the failover, these tracks are likely to be the subject of further accesses after the failover. Thus, the benefits of the reductions in latency are likely to be realized in future cache accesses at the surviving processor node after failover.

FIG. 15 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed at the failover manager 1254 ₂ in the surviving second processor node 1250 ₂ to which failover occurred after the failover receiving the cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂. The second processor node 1250 ₂ receives (at block 1500) the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁ for transfer of assignment of the first storage areas in the first assigned storage area 1258 ₁ to the second processor node 1250 ₂. The failover manager 1254 ₂ may temporarily assign (at block 1502) additional memory space in the memory 138 of the second processor node 1250 ₂ to store track format information provided in the received first cache transfer list 1300 ₁. The failover manager 1254 ₂ may then add (at block 1504) track identifiers 1302 in the received first cache transfer list 1300 ₁ to the demoted cache LRU list 500 in the second processor node 1250 ₂. In one embodiment, all the track identifiers 1302 in the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁ may be added to the demoted cache LRU list 500 in the second processor node 1250 ₂. In an alternative embodiment, if there are not enough space in the demoted cache LRU list 500 for all the track identifiers 1302 in the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁, then only a portion of the track identifiers 1302 in the first cache transfer list 1300 ₁ may be added. In a further embodiment, some entries may be removed from the demoted cache LRU list 500 to free space for entries from the cache transfer list 1300 ₁. In certain embodiments, entries from the existing cache LRU list 500 and the cache transfer list 1300 ₁ may be merged and added based on a timestamp of the last access, so that a fixed number of the most recently accessed tracks indicated in both lists 500 and 1300 ₁ are included in the cache LRU list 500.

For each track i in the received first cache transfer list 1300 ₁ included in the demoted cache LRU list 500, the failover manager 1254 ₂ (or cache manager 142 at the second processing node 1250 ₂) may perform the operations at blocks 1036, 1038, 1040, 1042 in FIG. 10b to add demoted cache control blocks 600 _(i) and indicate in the entry 700 _(i) of the demoted cache control block directory 700 for the track i. The failover manager 1254 ₂ ends (at block 1508) the quiescing of read and write requests to the first storage areas and redirect the I/O requests to those first storage areas to the second processor node 1250 ₂. The failover manager 1254 ₂ acknowledges (at block 1510) to the first processor node 1250 ₁ that the failover completed to allow for shutdown, repair or code load of the code load 1256 ₁ at the first processor node 1250 ₁.

With the operations of FIG. 15, the second processor node 1250 ₂ incorporates the track format metadata of tracks that were in the cache 140 of the first processor node 1250 ₁ at the time of the failover into the demoted cache control blocks 300 at the second processor node 1250 ₂ to be available to use for tracks staged into the cache 140 at the second processor node 1250 ₂. In this way, latency is improved at the second processor node 1250 ₂ to which failover occurred because the second processor node may determine the track format metadata from the cache control blocks 300 instead of having to read track metadata from the storage 1206 to determine the track format layout.

FIG. 16 illustrates an embodiment of operations performed at the failover manager 1254 ₁, 1254 ₂ of the surviving processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ to failback to the other processor node 1250 ₂, 1250 ₁, from which failover occurred, and reassign the storage area, e.g., volumes, initially assigned to the failed processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂, back to the failed processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ to again operate in dual cluster mode. Upon initiating (at block 1600) a failback of the first storage areas, initially assigned to the first processor node 1250 ₁ in the first assigned storage areas 1258 ₁, from the second processor node 1250 ₂ back to the first processor node 1250 ₁, the failover manager 1254 ₂ quiesces (at block 1602) reads and writes to both the first and second storage areas currently directed to the second processor node 1250 ₂. The bus 1228 and network 1234 host adaptors may quiesce the I/O requests in the adaptors 1228 and 1234. Modified data in the second cache 140 ₂ is destaged (at block 1604) and ownership of the first storage areas is transferred from the second processor node 1250 ₂ back to the first processor node 1250 ₁, so that the adaptors 1228 and 1234 will direct I/O requests to the first storage areas to the first processor node 1250 ₁. Thus, second storage areas from the assigned storage areas 1258 ₂ assigned to the second processor node 1250 ₂ remain assigned to the second processor node 1250 ₂.

The failover manager 1254 ₂ proceeds to block 1608 to build a second cache transfer list 1300 ₂. At block 1608, the failover manager 1254 ₂ selects (at block 1608) a first track from the MRU end 402 of the cache LRU list 400 of the second processor node 1250 ₂ that is directed to the first storage area and accesses (at block 1610) the cache control block 300 ₁ for the selected track in the cache control block directory 300 of the second processor node 1250 ₂. If (at block 1612) the accessed cache control block 300 _(i) has a valid track format code 314 for a track in the first storage area, then an entry 1300 _(2,j) is added to the second cache transfer list 1300 ₂ having the track identifier of the selected track and the track format code 314 in the accessed cache control block 300 _(i) in fields 1302 and 1304, respectively. If (from the no branch of block 1612) there is no valid track format code 314 in the cache control block 300 _(i), such as if track format code valid flag 316 indicates invalid, or after adding the entry 1300 _(2,j) to the second cache transfer list 1300 ₂, then a determination is made if (at block 1616) there are further tracks in the cache LRU list 400 at the second processor node 1250 ₂ to consider. If so, then a next track in the cache LRU list 400 at the second processor node 1250 ₂ is selected (at block 1618) and control proceeds back to block 1610 to determine whether to include an entry 1300 _(2,j) in the second cache transfer list 1300 ₂. If (at block 1616) there are no further entries in the cache LRU list 400 of the second processor node 1250 ₂, then the second cache transfer list 1300 ₂ is transmitted (at block 1620) to the first processor node 1250 ₁ and failback complete may then be returned (at block 1622) to the first processor node 1250 ₁.

With the operations of FIG. 16, the processor node 1250 ₁, 1250 ₂ that is performing a failback to return assignment of the storage areas back to the failed processor node, generates a cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂ having information on the track format codes or track format information for tracks in the cache 140 for the first storage areas to reassign back. This allows the first processor node 1250 ₁ to avoid having to read track metadata from the storage 1206 after the failback because the track format and layout may be obtained from the track format information provided in the cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂. This improves I/O processing performance in the processor node to which operations are restored during a failback because the processor node brought back online does not have to read the track metadata in the storage to determine the track format metadata when the track format metadata is provided the cache transfer list. Further, since the track format metadata in the cache transfer list 1300 ₁, 1300 ₂ is for tracks that were already in the cache 140 before the failback, these tracks are likely to be the subject of further accesses after the failback. Thus, the benefits of the reductions in latency are likely to be realized in future cache accesses at the processor node to which functionality is restored as a result of the failback.

The present invention may be implemented as a system, a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.

The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.

Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.

Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.

Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.

These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.

The computational components of FIG. 1, including the host 100 and storage system 102 may be implemented in one or more computer systems, such as the computer system 1702 shown in FIG. 17. Computer system/server 1702 may be described in the general context of computer system executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer system. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and so on that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer system/server 1702 may be practiced in distributed cloud computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed cloud computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer system storage media including memory storage devices.

As shown in FIG. 17, the computer system/server 1702 is shown in the form of a general-purpose computing device. The components of computer system/server 1702 may include, but are not limited to, one or more processors or processing units 1704, a system memory 1706, and a bus 1708 that couples various system components including system memory 1706 to processor 1704. Bus 1708 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus.

Computer system/server 1702 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessible by computer system/server 1702, and it includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

System memory 1706 can include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 1710 and/or cache memory 1712. Computer system/server 1702 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 1713 can be provided for reading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (not shown and typically called a “hard drive”). Although not shown, a magnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”), and an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided. In such instances, each can be connected to bus 1708 by one or more data media interfaces. As will be further depicted and described below, memory 1706 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments of the invention.

Program/utility 1714, having a set (at least one) of program modules 1716, may be stored in memory 806 by way of example, and not limitation, as well as an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each of the operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data or some combination thereof, may include an implementation of a networking environment. The components of the computer 1702 may be implemented as program modules 1716 which generally carry out the functions and/or methodologies of embodiments of the invention as described herein. The systems of FIG. 1 may be implemented in one or more computer systems 1702, where if they are implemented in multiple computer systems 1702, then the computer systems may communicate over a network.

Computer system/server 1702 may also communicate with one or more external devices 1718 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 1720, etc.; one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computer system/server 1702; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable computer system/server 1702 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication can occur via Input/Output (I/O) interfaces 1722. Still yet, computer system/server 1702 can communicate with one or more networks such as a local area network (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter 1724. As depicted, network adapter 1724 communicates with the other components of computer system/server 1702 via bus 1708. It should be understood that although not shown, other hardware and/or software components could be used in conjunction with computer system/server 1702. Examples, include, but are not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.

The terms “an embodiment”, “embodiment”, “embodiments”, “the embodiment”, “the embodiments”, “one or more embodiments”, “some embodiments”, and “one embodiment” mean “one or more (but not all) embodiments of the present invention(s)” unless expressly specified otherwise.

The terms “including”, “comprising”, “having” and variations thereof mean “including but not limited to”, unless expressly specified otherwise.

The enumerated listing of items does not imply that any or all of the items are mutually exclusive, unless expressly specified otherwise.

The terms “a”, “an” and “the” mean “one or more”, unless expressly specified otherwise.

Devices that are in communication with each other need not be in continuous communication with each other, unless expressly specified otherwise. In addition, devices that are in communication with each other may communicate directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries.

A description of an embodiment with several components in communication with each other does not imply that all such components are required. On the contrary a variety of optional components are described to illustrate the wide variety of possible embodiments of the present invention.

When a single device or article is described herein, it will be readily apparent that more than one device/article (whether or not they cooperate) may be used in place of a single device/article. Similarly, where more than one device or article is described herein (whether or not they cooperate), it will be readily apparent that a single device/article may be used in place of the more than one device or article or a different number of devices/articles may be used instead of the shown number of devices or programs. The functionality and/or the features of a device may be alternatively embodied by one or more other devices which are not explicitly described as having such functionality/features. Thus, other embodiments of the present invention need not include the device itself.

The foregoing description of various embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto. The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims herein after appended. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer program product for managing tracks between a first processor node including a first cache and a second processor node including a second cache, wherein the first cache and the second cache are used to cache tracks from a storage, the computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having computer readable program code executed in the first and second processor nodes to cause the first and second processor nodes to perform operations, the operations comprising: for the tracks cached in the first cache, determining whether track format codes identifying track format information indicating a layout and format of data are indicated as valid; and transmitting, by the first processor node, the track format information for the tracks in the first cache determined to have track format codes indicated as valid via a communication line to the second processor node to use to process read and write requests to the tracks in the second cache, wherein the second processor node receives the transmission of the track format information for the tracks in the first cache determined to have track format codes indicated as valid from the first processor node over the communication line.
 2. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the track format code is defined in a first track format table at the first processor node and a second track format table at the second processor node, wherein the first and second track format tables associate track format codes with track format metadata.
 3. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: destaging modified data from the first and the second caches into the storage, wherein the track format information is transmitted after destaging the modified data.
 4. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: for a plurality of tracks in the second cache, determining whether there is track format information indicating a layout of data for the tracks in the second cache; and transmitting, by the second processor node, the track format information for the tracks in the second cache to the first processor node to use to process read and write requests to tracks in the first cache.
 5. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: maintaining, by the second processor node, a demoted track list indicating tracks demoted from the second cache for which track format information is maintained; and including track identifiers in the demoted track list for the tracks in the first cache for which the track format information is transmitted into the second processor node.
 6. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the track format code is defined in a first track format table at the first processor node and a second track format table at the second processor node, wherein the first and the second track format tables associate track format codes with track format metadata, wherein the second processor node uses the track format information for a track by performing: staging, by the second processor node, a track into the second cache; generating a cache control block for the staged track; determining whether there is track format information for the staged track; and including the track format information for the staged track in the cache control block for the staged track in response to determining there is track format information for the staged track.
 7. The computer program product of claim 1, wherein the operations performed by the second processor node comprise: for tracks for which the transmitted track format information provides track format information, generating a demoted track cache control block indicating the track for which the transmitted track format information provides the track format information for the track; generating a cache control block for a track staged into the second cache; determining whether there is a demoted cache control block for the track staged into the second cache; and including the track format information in the demoted cache control block for the track staged into the second cache in the cache control block for the track staged into the second cache.
 8. A system coupled to a storage, comprising: a first processor node including a first cache to cache tracks from the storage; a second processor node including a second cache to cache tracks from the storage; wherein the first processor node and the second processor node perform a failover from the first processor node to the second processor node by performing operations, the operations comprising: for the tracks cached in the first cache, determining whether track format codes identifying track format information indicating a layout and format of data are indicated as valid; and transmitting, by the first processor node, the track format information for the tracks in the first cache determined to have track format codes indicated as valid via a communication line to the second processor node to use to process read and write requests to tracks in the second cache, wherein the second processor node receives the transmission of the track format information for the tracks in the first cache determined to have track format codes indicated as valid from the first processor node over the communication line.
 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the track format code is defined in a first track format table at the first processor node and a second track format table at the second processor node, wherein the first and second track format tables associate track format codes with track format metadata.
 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the operations further comprise: destaging modified data from the first and the second caches into the storage, wherein the track format information is transmitted after destaging the modified data.
 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the operations further comprise: for a plurality of tracks in the second cache, determining whether there is track format information indicating a layout of data for the tracks in the second cache; and transmitting, by the second processor node, the track format information for the tracks in the second cache to the first processor node to use to process read and write requests to tracks in the first cache.
 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the operations further comprise: maintaining, by the second processor node, a demoted track list indicating tracks demoted from the second cache for which track format information is maintained; and including track identifiers in the demoted track list for the tracks in the first cache for which the track format information is transmitted into the second processor node.
 13. The system of claim 8, wherein the track format code is defined in a first track format table at the first processor node and a second track format table at the second processor node, wherein the first and the second track format tables associate track format codes with track format metadata, wherein the second processor node uses the track format information for a track by performing: staging, by the second processor node, a track into the second cache; generating a cache control block for the staged track; determining whether there is track format information for the staged track; and including the track format information for the staged track in the cache control block for the staged track in response to determining there is track format information for the staged track.
 14. The system of claim 8, wherein the operations performed by the second processor node comprise: for tracks for which the transmitted track format information provides track format information, generating a demoted track cache control block indicating the track for which the transmitted track format information provides the track format information for the track; generating a cache control block for a track staged into the second cache; determining whether there is a demoted cache control block for the track staged into the second cache; and including the track format information in the demoted cache control block for the track staged into the second cache in the cache control block for the track staged into the second cache.
 15. A method for managing failover from a first processor node including a first cache to a second processor node including a second cache, wherein the first cache and the second cache are used to cache tracks from a storage, comprising: for the tracks cached in the first cache, determining whether track format codes identifying track format information indicating a layout and format of data are indicated as valid; and transmitting, by the first processor node, the track format information for the tracks in the first cache determined to have track format codes indicated as valid via a communication line to the second processor node to use to process read and write requests to the tracks in the second cache, wherein the second processor node receives the transmission of the track format information for the tracks in the first cache determined to have track format codes indicated as valid from the first processor node over the communication line.
 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising: destaging modified data from the first and the second caches into the storage, wherein the track format information is transmitted after destaging the modified data.
 17. The method of claim 15, further comprising: for a plurality of tracks in the second cache, determining whether there is track format information indicating a layout of data for the tracks in the second cache; and transmitting, by the second processor node, the track format information for the tracks in the second cache to the first processor node to use to process read and write requests to tracks in the first cache.
 18. The method of claim 15, further comprising: maintaining, by the second processor node, a demoted track list indicating tracks demoted from the second cache for which track format information is maintained; and including track identifiers in the demoted track list for the tracks in the first cache for which the track format information is transmitted into the second processor node.
 19. The method of claim 15, wherein the track format code is defined in a first track format table at the first processor node and a second track format table at the second processor node, wherein the first and the second track format tables associate track format codes with track format metadata, wherein the second processor node further performs: staging a track into the second cache; generating a cache control block for the staged track; determining whether there is track format information for the staged track; and including the track format information for the staged track in the cache control block for the staged track in response to determining there is track format information for the staged track.
 20. The method of claim 15, wherein the second processor node further performs: for tracks for which the transmitted track format information provides track format information, generating a demoted track cache control block indicating the track for which the transmitted track format information provides the track format information for the track; generating a cache control block for a track staged into the second cache; determining whether there is a demoted cache control block for the track staged into the second cache; and including the track format information in the demoted cache control block for the track staged into the second cache in the cache control block for the track staged into the second cache. 